#1 in the Ark-La-Tex

Saturday, January 11, 2020

WHAT MAKES A 2020 TOYOTA TUNDRA BETTER THAN A 2020 CHEVY SILVERADO?

WHAT MAKES A 2020 TOYOTA TUNDRA BETTER THAN A 2020 CHEVROLET SILVERADO?

SAFETY 


© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Toyota Tundra are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Chevrolet Silverado doesn’t offer height-adjustable seat belts.
The Tundra’s driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The Silverado doesn’t offer a driver alert monitor.
Both the Tundra and the Silverado have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available four-wheel drive, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.

WARRANTY 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Tundra’s corrosion warranty is unlimited miles longer than the Silverado’s (unlimited vs. 100,000 miles).
Toyota pays for scheduled maintenance on the Tundra for 2 years and 25000 miles. Toyota will pay for oil changes, lubrication and any other required maintenance. Chevrolet only pays for the first scheduled maintenance visit on the Silverado.

RELIABILITY 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

For smoother operation, better efficiency and fewer moving parts, the Tundra has an overhead cam design, rather than the old pushrod design of some of the engines in the Silverado.
A reliable vehicle saves its owner time, money and trouble. Nobody wants to be stranded or have to be without a vehicle while it’s being repaired. Consumer Reports rates the Tundra’s reliability 46 points higher than the Silverado.
J.D. Power and Associates rated the Tundra third among large light duty pickups in their 2019 Initial Quality Study. The Silverado isn’t in the top three.
J.D. Power and Associates’ 2019 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Toyota vehicles are more reliable than Chevrolet vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Toyota second in reliability, above the industry average. With 7 more problems per 100 vehicles, Chevrolet is ranked fourth.
From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ December 2018 Auto Issue reports that Toyota vehicles are more reliable than Chevrolet vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Toyota second in reliability. Chevrolet is ranked 23rd.

ENGINE 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Tundra’s 5.7 DOHC V8 produces 96 more horsepower (381 vs. 285) and 96 lbs.-ft. more torque (401 vs. 305) than the Silverado’s standard 4.3 V6. The Tundra’s 5.7 DOHC V8 produces 71 more horsepower (381 vs. 310) and 53 lbs.-ft. more torque (401 vs. 348) than the Silverado’s optional 2.7 turbo 4 cyl. The Tundra’s 5.7 DOHC V8 produces 26 more horsepower (381 vs. 355) and 18 lbs.-ft. more torque (401 vs. 383) than the Silverado’s optional 5.3 V8.
As tested in Motor Trend the Toyota Tundra is faster than the Chevrolet Silverado V6:
Tundra
Silverado
Zero to 30 MPH
2 sec
2.4 sec
Zero to 60 MPH
6 sec
7.2 sec
Zero to 80 MPH
10.5 sec
12.8 sec
Quarter Mile
14.6 sec
15.6 sec
Speed in 1/4 Mile
93.6 MPH
88.7 MPH

FUEL ECONOMY AND RANGE 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Toyota Tundra uses regular unleaded gasoline. The Silverado LTZ/High Country requires premium for maximum efficiency, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.
The Tundra’s standard fuel tank has 2.4 gallons more fuel capacity than the Silverado Double/Crew Cab’s standard fuel tank (26.4 vs. 24 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups. The Tundra’s optional fuel tank has 10 gallons more fuel capacity than the Silverado Regular Cab’s standard fuel tank (38 vs. 28 gallons).

BRAKES AND STOPPING 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
For better stopping power the Tundra’s front brake rotors are larger than those on the Silverado:
Tundra
Silverado
Front Rotors
13.9 inches
13.5 inches
The Tundra stops shorter than the Silverado:
Tundra
Silverado
60 to 0 MPH
130 feet
134 feet
Motor Trend

TIRES AND WHEELS 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Tundra has standard 18-inch wheels. Smaller 
17-inch wheels are standard on the Silverado.

SUSPENSION AND HANDLING 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Tundra TRD Sport has front and rear stabilizer bars, which help keep the Tundra TRD Sport flat and controlled during cornering. The Silverado’s suspension doesn’t offer a rear stabilizer bar.
For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Tundra Standard Bed Double Cab’s wheelbase is 6.1 inches longer than on the Silverado 1500 Long Bed Regular Cab (145.7 inches vs. 139.6 inches). The Tundra Long Bed Double Cab’s wheelbase is 7.6 inches longer than on the Silverado Standard Bed Crew Cab (164.6 feet vs. 157 inches).
The Tundra Short Bed Limited CrewMax 4x4 handles at .72 G’s, while the Silverado Short Bed LT Trail Boss Crew Cab pulls only .69 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.
The Tundra Standard Bed Limited Double Cab 4x4 executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1.3 seconds quicker than the Silverado Short Bed LT Trail Boss Crew Cab (28.7 seconds @ .57 average G’s vs. 30 seconds @ .55 average G’s).
For better maneuverability, the Tundra’s turning circle is tighter than the Silverado’s:
Tundra
Silverado
Extended Cab Standard Bed
44 feet
46.3 feet
Extended Cab Long Bed
49 feet
n/a
Crew Cab Short Bed
44 feet
46.3 feet
Extended Cab Standard Bed 4x4
44 feet
46.3 feet
Extended Cab Long Bed 4x4
49 feet
n/a
Crew Cab Short Bed 4x4
44 feet
46.3 feet
For greater off-road capability the Tundra Short Bed CrewMax has a 2.4 inches greater minimum ground clearance than the Silverado Standard Bed Crew Cab (10.4 vs. 8 inches), allowing the Tundra to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged.

CHASSIS 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Tundra is shorter than the Silverado, making the Tundra easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces:
Tundra
Silverado
Extended Cab Standard Bed
228.9 inches
231.7 inches
Crew Cab Short Bed
228.9 inches
231.7 inches
As tested by Car and Driver while under full throttle, the interior of the Tundra Short Bed Platinum CrewMax 4x4 is quieter than the Silverado Short Bed High Country Crew Cab 4x4 (74 vs. 76 dB).

PASSENGER SPACE 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Tundra Double Cab has 1.4 inches more front hip room, 2.4 inches more rear hip room and .7 inches more rear shoulder room than the Silverado Double Cab.
The Tundra CrewMax has 1.4 inches more front hip room, .2 inches more rear hip room and .3 inches more rear shoulder room than the Silverado Crew Cab.
For enhanced passenger comfort on long trips the Tundra CrewMax’s rear seats recline. The Silverado’s optional rear seats don’t recline.

CARGO CAPACITY 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Toyota Tundra has a standard Easy Lower and Lift Tailgate, which prevents the heavy tailgate from falling with a crash and causing injury. It allows adults and children to easily open and close the tailgate with one hand to better facilitate loading and unloading. Tailgate assist costs extra on the Chevrolet Silverado.
Both the Tundra and Silverado have bed indentations that accommodate 2x4’s for two-tiered loading, but the Tundra also has indentations to separate the cargo box into three different sections length-wise.

TOWING 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Tundra’s minimum standard towing capacity is much higher than the Silverado’s (9800 vs. 7400 pounds).
While the Silverado Short Bed Crew Cab 4x4 2.7 Turbo can only tow 6600, any Tundra can tow a minimum of 9800 pounds.

ERGONOMICS 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Tundra’s standard power windows allow the driver or passenger to lower and raise the windows without leaning over or being distracted. Power windows cost extra on the Silverado.
The Tundra’s standard power locks allow the driver or passenger to lock or unlock all the doors at a touch without leaning over. Power locks cost extra on the Silverado.
The Tundra has standard power remote mirrors. The Silverado only comes with remote mirrors at extra cost. Without them the driver will have to roll down the windows and reach across the car to adjust the mirrors.
The Tundra’s standard outside mirrors include heating elements to clear off the mirrors for better visibility. Chevrolet charges extra for heated mirrors on the Silverado.
The Tundra has a standard center folding armrest for the driver and front passenger. A center armrest helps combat driver fatigue. The Silverado Work Truck doesn’t offer a front seat center armrest.

RECOMMENDATIONS 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
Consumer Reports® recommends the Toyota Tundra, based on reliability, safety and performance. The Chevrolet Silverado isn't recommended.

WHAT MAKES A 2020 TOYOTA TUNDRA BETTER THAN A 2019 FORD F-150?

WHAT MAKES A 2020 TOYOTA TUNDRA BETTER THAN A 2019 FORD F-150?



SAFETY 


© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Toyota Tundra are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Ford F-150 has only front height-adjustable seat belts.
The Tundra’s driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The F-150 doesn’t offer a driver alert monitor.
Both the Tundra and the F-150 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available four-wheel drive, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Toyota Tundra is safer than the Ford F-150:
Tundra
F-150
Front Seat
STARS
5 Stars
5 Stars
HIC
15
22
Chest Movement
.6 inches
.8 inches
Hip Force
120 lbs.
174 lbs.
Rear Seat
STARS
5 Stars
Into Pole
STARS
5 Stars
5 Stars
HIC
396
414
Spine Acceleration
34 G’s
42 G’s
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

WARRANTY 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
Toyota pays for scheduled maintenance on the Tundra for 2 years and 25000 miles. Toyota will pay for oil changes, lubrication and any other required maintenance. Ford doesn’t pay scheduled maintenance for the F-150.

RELIABILITY 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
A reliable vehicle saves its owner time, money and trouble. Nobody wants to be stranded or have to be without a vehicle while it’s being repaired. Consumer Reports rates the Tundra’s reliability 32 points higher than the F-150.
J.D. Power and Associates’ 2019 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Toyota vehicles are more reliable than Ford vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Toyota second in reliability, above the industry average. With 38 more problems per 100 vehicles, Ford is ranked 16th.
From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ December 2018 Auto Issue reports that Toyota vehicles are more reliable than Ford vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Toyota second in reliability. Ford is ranked 18th.

ENGINE 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

The Tundra’s 5.7 DOHC V8 produces 91 more horsepower (381 vs. 290) and 136 lbs.-ft. more torque (401 vs. 265) than the F-150’s standard 3.3 DOHC V6. The Tundra’s 5.7 DOHC V8 produces 56 more horsepower (381 vs. 325) and 1 lbs.-ft. more torque (401 vs. 400) than the F-150’s optional 2.7 turbo V6. The Tundra’s 5.7 DOHC V8 produces 6 more horsepower (381 vs. 375) than the F-150’s optional 3.5 turbo V6.
As tested in Motor Trend the Toyota Tundra is faster than the Ford F-150:
Tundra
F-150 V6
F-150 2.7 turbo V6
Zero to 30 MPH
2 sec
2.8 sec
2.5 sec
Zero to 60 MPH
6 sec
7.9 sec
7 sec
Zero to 80 MPH
10.5 sec
13.5 sec
12.2 sec
Quarter Mile
14.6 sec
16.1 sec
15.5 sec
Speed in 1/4 Mile
93.6 MPH
86.7 MPH
89.5 MPH

FUEL ECONOMY AND RANGE 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Toyota Tundra uses regular unleaded gasoline. The F-150 with the 3.5 turbo V6 engine requires premium for maximum efficiency, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.
The Tundra’s standard fuel tank has 3.4 gallons more fuel capacity than the F-150’s standard fuel tank (26.4 vs. 23 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups. The Tundra’s optional fuel tank has 2 gallons more fuel capacity than the F-150’s optional fuel tank (38 vs. 36 gallons).

BRAKES AND STOPPING 



© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11
The Tundra stops much shorter than the F-150:
Tundra
F-150
70 to 0 MPH
189 feet
206 feet
Car and Driver
60 to 0 MPH
130 feet
140 feet
Motor Trend

TIRES AND WHEELS 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

For better traction, the Tundra has larger standard tires than the F-150 (255/70R18 vs. 245/70R17).
For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Tundra has standard 18-inch wheels. Smaller 17-inch wheels are standard on the F-150.

SUSPENSION AND HANDLING 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

The Tundra TRD Sport has front and rear stabilizer bars, which help keep the Tundra TRD Sport flat and controlled during cornering. The F-150’s suspension doesn’t offer a rear stabilizer bar.
For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Tundra’s wheelbase is longer than on the F-150:
Tundra
F-150
Extended Cab Standard Bed
145.7 inches
145 inches
Extended Cab Long Bed
164.6 inches
163.7 inches
Crew Cab Short Bed
145.7 inches
145 inches
The Tundra Short Bed Platinum CrewMax 4x4 handles at .71 G’s, while the F-150 Raptor SuperCab pulls only .68 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.
The Tundra Standard Bed Limited Double Cab 4x4 executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the F-150 Raptor SuperCab (28.7 seconds @ .57 average G’s vs. 29.2 seconds @ .59 average G’s).
For better maneuverability, the Tundra’s turning circle is tighter than the F-150’s:
Tundra
F-150
Extended Cab Standard Bed
44 feet
47.1 feet
Extended Cab Long Bed
49 feet
53 feet
Crew Cab Short Bed
44 feet
47.8 feet
Extended Cab Standard Bed 4x4
44 feet
47.1 feet
Extended Cab Long Bed 4x4
49 feet
53 feet
Crew Cab Short Bed 4x4
44 feet
47.8 feet
For greater off-road capability the Tundra Short Bed CrewMax has a 1.1 inches greater minimum ground clearance than the F-150 6.5 ft. bed SuperCrew (10.4 vs. 9.3 inches), allowing the Tundra to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged.

CHASSIS 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

The Tundra is shorter than the F-150, making the Tundra easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces:
Tundra
F-150
Extended Cab Standard Bed
228.9 inches
231.9 inches
Crew Cab Short Bed
228.9 inches
231.9 inches
As tested by Car and Driver, the interior of the Tundra Short Bed Platinum CrewMax 4x4 is quieter than the F-150 Raptor SuperCab:
Tundra
F-150
Full-Throttle
74 dB
86 dB
70 MPH Cruising
67 dB
68 dB

PASSENGER SPACE 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

The Tundra Double Cab has .1 inches more front hip room and 1.2 inches more rear legroom than the F-150 SuperCab.
For enhanced passenger comfort on long trips the Tundra CrewMax’s rear seats recline. The F-150’s optional rear seats don’t recline.

CARGO CAPACITY 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

The Tundra Double Cab Standard Bed has a much larger cargo box than the F-150 SuperCab Standard Bed (66.3 vs. 62.3 cubic feet). The Tundra Double Cab Long Bed has a much larger cargo box than the F-150 SuperCab Long Bed (82.5 vs. 77.4 cubic feet).
The Tundra CrewMax has a much larger cargo box than the F-150 SuperCrew Short Bed (56.1 vs. 52.8 cubic feet).
The Toyota Tundra has a standard Easy Lower and Lift Tailgate, which prevents the heavy tailgate from falling with a crash and causing injury. It allows adults and children to easily open and close the tailgate with one hand to better facilitate loading and unloading. Tailgate assist costs extra on the Ford F-150.

PAYLOAD AND TOWING 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

The Tundra’s minimum standard towing capacity is much higher than the F-150’s (9800 vs. 5000 pounds).
The Tundra has a much higher standard payload capacity than the F-150:
Tundra
F-150
Crew Cab
1660 lbs.
1200 lbs.
Crew Cab 4x4
1560 lbs.
1200 lbs.

ERGONOMICS 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

The Tundra’s standard power windows allow the driver or passenger to lower and raise the windows without leaning over or being distracted. Power windows cost extra on the F-150.
The Tundra’s standard driver’s power window lowers with one touch of the window control, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths. The F-150’s basic optional power windows’ switch has to be held the entire time to open it fully.
The Tundra’s standard power locks allow the driver or passenger to lock or unlock all the doors at a touch without leaning over. Power locks cost extra on the F-150.
The Tundra has standard power remote mirrors. The F-150 only comes with remote mirrors at extra cost. Without them the driver will have to roll down the windows and reach across the car to adjust the mirrors.
The Tundra’s standard outside mirrors include heating elements to clear off the mirrors for better visibility. Ford charges extra for heated mirrors on the F-150.
When the Tundra Platinum/1794 is put in reverse, both rearview mirrors tilt from their original position. This gives the driver a better view of the curb during parallel parking maneuvers. Shifting out of reverse puts the mirrors into their original positions. The F-150’s mirrors don’t automatically adjust for backing.
Bluetooth wireless connectivity is standard on the Tundra, connecting the driver and passenger’s cell phones to the vehicle systems. This allows them to use the vehicle’s stereo and hand controls to place calls safely and easily. Bluetooth costs extra on the F-150.

ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES 

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 3IURH-Y1SNQ 208.42.217.34 2020-01-11

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Tundra is less expensive to operate than the F-150 because typical repairs cost much less on the Tundra than the F-150, including $96 less for a water pump, $206 less for fuel injection and $199 less for a power steering pump.